Tuesday, August 28, 2007

Voreqe Snubs Chief's Peace Offer

Chief's Call for Reconciliation

August 27, 2007
A PARAMOUNT chief's call for national reconciliation in a newspaper advertisement has been welcomed by several civil leaders although the military labelled it as "inciteful".
Commander Land Force Colonel Pita Driti said Naitasiri paramount chief, the Turaga na Qaranivalu, Ratu Inoke Takiveikata's full page advertisement in The Sunday Times yesterday which outlined suggestions for amnesty and immunity from prosecution in the December 5 takeover was tantamount to incitement.
In the advertisement, Ratu Inoke warned hatred would be institutionalised in the absence of genuine reconciliation.
"Nothing this regime undertakes will ever be legal and the regime can not force its will upon the people," he said.
He said the methods used to achieve some of the interim regime's objectives were illegal and unacceptable. Ratu Inoke said the objectives outlined for and by the interim Government should be the priority of a newly-elected Government.
But Colonel Driti said Ratu Inoke should change his views if he wanted to discuss the issues he highlighted with the military.
Ratu Inoke recently had his conviction and jail sentence for mutiny-related charges quashed this year.
A retrial was ordered by the High Court.
Army chief of staff Colonel Mosese Tikoitoga said the military would only seriously consider his call when he was cleared by the courts. "He is not free. He is not credible," he said.
"Anybody can put out such a paid advertisement if they have the money and if the newspaper can publish it.
"As far as the RFMF is concerned, he (Ratu Inoke) is still an accused until proven otherwise by the court.
"We don't know if his comments were personal or if it was backed by his followers," Colonel Tikoitoga said.
He reiterated earlier calls by Colonel Driti that there were demagogues whom the military kept its eye on.
"Quite a few of them (demagogues) are working on the ignorance of the indigenous Fijians. They play on emotions. But the RFMF is prepared to meet that," Colonel Tikoitoga said.
Former Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka said the advertisement should have been the last resort and Ratu Inoke should have gone straight to the interim Prime Minister Commodore Voreqe Bainimarama with such issues.
Deposed Opposition leader Mick Beddoes supported Ratu Inoke's suggestions, saying there was "very little to dispute about our situation as he describes".
"Unless we, as a people, acquire the good sense to recognise this and take steps to alter our course, we can't avoid the perils that await us," he said.
Fiji Women's Crisis Centre co-ordinator Shamima Ali said everyone had a right to want to take the country forward but this should be done in a positive fashion that was non-violent and peaceful in nature.
"Ratu Inoke's suggestion should be welcomed by the interim Government," she said. Great Council of Chiefs chairman Ratu Ovini Bokini supported the call, saying society had developed a bred of self-righteous, stubborn people who had forgot to revere and respect God.
"There is wisdom in Ratu Inoke's words and his intentions and noble and good. Who are we to turn away an apology when one is made as such? Our role as humans, as God's children is to accept the apology and move on, in the same way God does us for our transgressions," he said.
National Federation Party leader Parmod Rae said Ratu Inoke's ideas were not made by "just an ordinary man" and that it provided a sound analysis of what Fiji was going through.

Monday, August 27, 2007

Chief throws away charter

26 August 2007
Namosi paramount chief, Turaga na Tui Namosi Ratu Suliano Matanitobua has thrown away the people’s charter. The paramount chief said he was very disappointed with the release by the Roko Tui Namosi; Joeli Besetimoala where he said the province supported the people’s charter. “As paramount chief of Namosi I disregard the Roko Tui’s release on the support by my province to the proposed National Council for Building a Better Fiji for all through a Peoples Charter for Change and Progress,” the paramount chief said.

He said he wanted the charter to be taken back to the district and the village level where the people truly understood its meaning. “I want the people to fully understand everything in the charter before it comes back to the council meeting.”

Ratu Suliano said he was the only one who could speak for the province and he questioned the authority that gave an officer to speak on behalf of the province. “I am back in the country and no one else is to speak for my province.” The Namosi paramount chief also called on the Ministry of Fijian Affairs to change the Roko Tui Namosi and said that he must be notified of any change to the officers of the Namosi Provincial Council.

Ratu Suliano said when people from other parts of Fiji made statement on the province sometimes it would create some disagreement amongst the people and it would take a lot of work to solve it. The Tui Namosi said the Roko Tui Namosi did not bother to contact him about the release and this was what he called disobedience.

Qaranivalu Pleads for Reconciliation

August 26, 2007
THE Qaranivalu, Ratu Inoke Takivekata, has issued an open invitation to the interim Prime Minister, Commander Voreqe Bainimarama, his regime and the military to participate in a national reconciliation.

In a full page advertisement, Ratu Inoke, who was imprisoned for life for his role in the November 2000 mutiny, suggested the national reconciliation would among other things ensure amnesty and immunity from prosecution to everyone involved in the 5 December coup; normalisation of all costitutional offices including the President, Vice President, Judiciary, Great Council of Chiefs, Public Service Commission; free and fair elections held no later than December next year; the demilitarisation of government and addressing Fiji's coup culture. Ratu Inoke said: ''I am making this plea to the regime because our beloved nation is undergoing unprecedented hardship, widening racial divisions and economic ruin.''

He said nothing that this regime undertakes will ever be legal and the regime cannot force its will upon the people.

Interim PM invited to participate in reconciliation process
www.fijivillage.com - 26 Aug 2007

Naitasiri High chief Ratu Inoke Takiveikata has invited the Interim Prime Minister Commodore Frank Bainimarama to participate in a national reconciliation process.In his first public statement since being released from prison two months ago, in an open letter to Bainimarama, the Qaranivalu said national reconciliation involves the amnesty and immunity from prosecution to everyone involved in the December 5th takeover, normalization of all constitutional offices including the President, Vice President, Judiciary, GCC, the Public Service Commission, the demilitarization of government, addressing Fiji's coup culture and for elections to be held before December 2008.
Ratu Inoke said the nation appreciates some of the noble objectives that the regime has set out to achieve but the methods used are not legal and acceptable, since these objectives should be a priority of a newly elected government.
He said if the nation does not come together to address the crisis that our country faces then Fiji's economy will go down the drain, with inflation rising and unemployment numbers increasing.Interim Prime Minister Commodore Frank Bainimarama is yet to comment on the matter.

Sunday, August 26, 2007

State Actions Brew Hatred

August 26, 2007

Update: 2.46pm INSTITUTIONALISED hatred could come about if the country does not jointly address the crisis we are facing, says the Qaranivalu, Ratu Inoke Takivekata, who believes that the unresolved deaths of civilians during the regime's control of security forces will lead to hatred.

The abuse of human rights and the torture of innocent civilians will also lead to hatred. These comments are contained in the full page advertisement of the Sunday Times today, and which also carries the Fijian version in a separate full page.
Ratu Inoke was convicted and sentenced to life in prison in 2004 for his involvement in the 2000 mutiny but was released two months ago after his case by the Fiji Court of Appeal quashed his case and ordered a re-trial.

The Naitasiri chief claims to have tried to engage in meetings with interim Prime Minister, Commander Voreqe Bainimarama and some members of his regime but was unsuccessful. The plea in his statement was an invitation to the interim regime and the military for national reconciliation.

''The unprofessional and unethical treatment of numerous government executives, board members, businesses and investors will also lead to hatred. Increasing the racial divide will bring about increased instability to our beloved country,'' Ratu Inoke said. The interim Government is expected to release their response tomorrow, says the Permanent Secretary in the interim Prime Minister's office, Pramesh Chand.

Thursday, August 23, 2007

Fatiaki takes State to court

Wednesday, August 22, 2007

Update: 1.58pm ACTING Chief Justice Anthony Gates has confirmed that the court case brought against the President and the interim Prime Minister by suspended Chief Justice Daniel Fatiaki will be heard in the Suva High Court on 3 September, according to a report by Radio New Zealand International.

Justice Gates also confirmed that a judge has been allocated to the case.

Mr Fatiaki is challenging his suspension by the interim government and the subsequent appointments made by the Judicial Services Commission, chaired by Justice Gates.

Aside from President Ratu Josefa Iloilo and the interim prime minister, the other defendants are the interim Attorney General Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum, the acting chief justice Anthony Gates and High Court judges Nazhat Shameem, John Byrne and Isikeli Mataitoga.

Three magistrates, the Public Service Commission chairman Rishi Ram and solicitor general Christopher Pryde are also among the defendants.

Mr Fatiaki is challenging his suspension by President Iloilo, the composition of the Judicial Services Commission and all appointments made by the commission in the absence of Mr Fatiaki on the grounds that it is not legally constituted.

Wednesday, August 22, 2007

The Undoing of the Illegal Interim Government

Tui Savu, Townsville, Australia

A cardinal rule of cross-examination, which the IG Advisors incorrectly applied, is ‘never ask a question you don’t know the answer to’, but it is too late now.

The High Court has ruled that FICAC has no locus standi to instigate criminal prosecutions in Fiji.

The High Court has also previously ruled against the IG; such as the reinstating of Fijian Teachers Union President Maika Namudu and the revoking of the unilateral decision to reduce the retirement age from 60 to 55, which are ominous signs for the IG.

However, the attitude of Bainimarama and his cronies since the coup reveals their utter disrespect for due process and the rule of law through their selective termination of CEO’s and other high profile Fijian executives and the various frivolous investigations against innocent Fiji citizens.

After some 8 months there is still no irrefutable evidence of endemic corruption implicating Qarase and his SDL Party as alleged, it is becoming very similar to Iraq with no WMD and the IG now desires to prolong the elections for at least another 5 years to defer the inevitable.

This brings me to the million-dollar question on everyone’s mind whether Bainimarama and his cronies’ are going to accept the High Court’s decision should it rule against the Presidential immunity and declare it unconstitutional and invalid and the December coup as illegal and unlawful?

Judging on the indifferent behaviour of Bainimarama and his cronies since the December coup and more recently the callous joke of General Elections to be held on 13/05/2009, it is not too difficult to foresee Bainimarama rejecting the High Court rulings and abrogating the 1997 Constitution.

Should these unfortunate state affairs transpire, it only confirms what many already knew, that is Bainimarama and his cronies executed this coup to prevent criminal charges against him and others and to remove Qarase.

One undetected fact now becoming more apparent is Bainimarama and his cronies fatally misread the Fijian mindset by believing that having the support of certain prominent chiefly families guaranteed the loyally of the majority of the Fijians.

However, what they didn’t envisage was the majority of the Fijians acting independently, embraced democracy and the rule of law and rejecting the coup despite the support of these prominent chiefly families.

Another unforseen phenomena are the uprising of young, professional Fijians vehemently opposing Bainimarama and his coup.

The ever-growing list of blog sites and u-tube sites reveals young professional Fijians who are now using their intellect, expertise, hearts and minds to rationally and logically justify their stance against the coup.

The majority of the Fijians to their credit were more discerning during this coup; however it was the Indians who became gullible.

It is my belief that history will look back at this period and despite what Bainimarama and his cronies inflicted upon the Fijian community, it will show it as the period of the rekindling of the taukei spirit and when the Fijians awoke from their slumber and become active and constructive participants in their national affairs.

In summary, despite all the illegal and injustice innocent citizens of Fiji have endured from this illegal regime, the unforseen phenomena the coup inadvertently unleased have sealed their fate.

Tui Savu,

Townsville. AUSTRALIA.

Leweni's appointment worries ex-diplomat

Wednesday August 22, 2007


Comment:
Everyone knows how eminently unqualified Leweni is for the posting. What does a Military Army Band conductor understand about international diplomacy and relations. We all know tis jobs for the boys and sooner we get a democratic government, sooner he is hauled back to his band master role.

Major Neumi Leweni
The appointment of army spokesman Major Neumi Leweni as Fiji's defence attaché to China has concerned former Ambassador Jeremaia Waqanisau.

Waqanisau who was recalled earlier in the year told the Fiji Times that Leweni was not qualified for the position.

Leweni will also be counsellor to Waqanisau's replacement, Sir James Ah Koy.

He said Leweni's predecessor Naipote Katonitabua was a university graduate and was the principal economic planning officer and was able to produce reports and plans for the embassy's missions and objectives.

"If he is going to replace the first secretary, he will not be able to do the job because he is not trained for that," said Waqanisau.

He added that Leweni's inability to do job of the first secretary will affect the embassy's mission.

Meanwhile interim Prime Minister Commodore Voreqe Bainimarama says he hopes Leweni's appointment as defence attaché to China will strengthen ties with its military.

"We thought it would be good to have a defense advisor in China," he said.

Bainimarama said the Fiji military had to look north after Australia, New Zealand and the US stopped military training and assistance.

Waqanisau said the post of the first secretary to the ambassador should be left to a civil servant.

He said appointing someone who did not have any knowledge of policies would be a disadvantage to the service.

Leweni is expected to leave for China with his family this Friday.

Leweni unfit for role: Ex-envoy

FTimes - Wednesday, August 22, 2007

Former Ambassador to China Jeremaia Waqanisau has expressed concern at the appointment of military spokesman Major Neumi Leweni as counsellor to his replacement, Sir James Ah Koy.

Mr Waqanisau, who was recalled from Mainland China earlier this year, said the First Secretary to Fiji's Ambassador to China Naipote Katonitabua was a university graduate and was the principal economic planning officer and was able to produce reports and plans for the embassy's missions and objectives.

"My concern is that if Major Leweni is going to replace the first secretary, he will not be able to do the job because he is not trained for that," said Mr Waqanisau.

He said Major Leweni's inability to do job of the first secretary would affect the embassy's mission.

Mr Waqanisau said he was still of the opinion the post of the first secretary to the ambassador should be left to a civil servant.

He said appointing someone who did not have any knowledge of policies would be a disadvantage to the service.

"When I came back from my post as Fiji's ambassador to China, I had raised this issue with the permanent secretary of Foreign Affairs," he said. He said his concern was the mission would not be successful if an unsuitable appointment was made.

Major Leweni is scheduled to leave for China with his family on Friday.

QVS victory

Sir, - Letter to Editor- 21 August 2007

I have nothing but admiration for the boys from Matavatucou on their victory in the Deans Trophy rubgy final.
It certainly befits their centennial year for the school to achieve such wonderful success at Laucala on Saturday. The school deserves it and for Fiji it again showed how Fijian pride emanates from a common focus and dedication in a cause.
As I listened in on Bula FM on the internet, I could feel the intensity of the Under-19 Deans final.
While I was keenly cheering for the boys from Delainakaikai, somehow I was equally satisfied in realising that a Tailevu team was guaranteed to win.

At times, the destination is not always as important as the journey when you are comfortable with the dedication shown for the cause, especially when such dedication and pride can be levered off to secure broader achievement goals.

As the two schools battled it out on Saturday in a competitive but clean spirit, one wonders about their prospects in an environment where the Fijian middle class has been gutted by the actions of the interim Government.

As each of the teams go back to focus on academic work, in front of them will be an uncertain future, where educated and well qualified Fijians have been pushed out of their jobs and investigated for unsubstantiated allegations of corruption.

For members of the interim administration, therein lies their challenge. To work towards restoring democratic government so that Fiji can be salvaged from the abyss thanks to a misguided military.
Otherwise, they will be party to, and credited with, the purging of Fijian pride in their own soil.
Sai Lelea
Wellington
NZ

Saturday, August 18, 2007

Fijian Pride

Deans final - Letter to Editor, 17 August 2007

AS the RKS Under-19 and three other teams prepare to lift all the trophies on offer on Saturday, at stake is something more powerful that the interim Government should take note of.

Fijian pride will be on display in a theatre of operation whose landscape has been carved with values such as respect for your fellow human beings, humility and selflessness.

These are intrinsic virtues upon which Fijian ethos, culture and practice over thousands of years have been based. The values were drummed into me as a proud former student of Delainakaikai and which will stay with me forever.

Regrettably, the actions of the interim Government toward Fijians and their institutions are contrary to those values and against its practice. They have belittled the position of chiefs, disbanded and disrespected the GCC and fanned inter-Fijian hatred through the actions of soldiers.

If any of the interim ministers intend to watch the games on Saturday, perhaps they may care to reflect on their policies and the impact in degrading Fijian pride.

In doing so, they may wonder what difference it would make to running the government if based on Fijian pride. That pride will cause me to celebrate a complete RKS victory on Saturday. And as the Under-19 team hoists the Deans Trophy, I will be happy to say to our neighbours at Matavatucou: Moce Mele".

Sai Lelea
Wellington

Friday, August 17, 2007

Legally flawed


Last updated FIJI SUN 8/13/2007

The press release given by Interim Minister Epeli Ganilau dated 08/08/07 regarding the purpose of the GCC is legally flawed and erroneous. It is curious that his press release posted in the Fiji Government Online page on Wednesday has already been removed.

He erred when he summarised the purpose of the GCC in his Press Release as:
'Therefore, what this means in very simple terms is that: (1) the GCC is an arm of government, (2) it exists to support government & (3) government is empowered under the law (Cap 120 Fijian Affairs Act) to regulate its operations to ensure that (1) & (2) maintained at all times.'


Whilst (1) is not disputed that the GCC is an arm of government, to claim it solely exists to support government (2) and that government is empowered to ensure that GCC does support the government is erroneous and misleading.

Furthermore, Minister Ganilau's desire to add via regulation the taking of oaths and disciplinary measures is wholly dependent on his legal capacity.

For instance, the reason why the GCC rejected President Iloilo's nominee of Interim Foreign Minister Nailatikau for VP is because the GCC realised that if it approved President Iloilo's nominee it would amount to the GCC condoning the illegal takeover and its illegal Regime.

Minister Ganilau's further intention to insert disciplinary measures to ensure there is no repeat of the above is tantamount to altering the Fijian Affairs Act, which cannot be done via regulation.

This means that even if Minister Ganilau has legal capacity to make regulation, he still needs Parliament and the approval of 9 of the 14 Senate Members of the GCC as defined in section 185(k) of the Constitution to amend the Act.

The reason Parliament only can pass the amendment pursuant to section 185(k) of the Constitution is because it was never the intention of the legislators to entrust all things Fijian to the government of the day.

It was foreseeable that since Fiji was moving towards a democratic system of government, the possibility exists that one day a non-Fijian led government will govern.

This happened in 1999 with the Chaudhry government and there is no legal impedient to prevent further non-Fijian led governments in the future. It would be also natural for non-Fijian led governments to pursue policies in line with its manifesto, but opposed by the Fijians and the GCC.

For instance, a non-led Fijian government wanting to abolish the NLTB, GCC, etc and free up native lands in Fiji would face objection from the GCC; hence the Fijians interest is protected by section 185(k) of the Constitution.
This protection also applies to future Fijian led governments who may want to abolish the NLTB, GCC, etc and free up native lands for sale as well, so the GCC is indeed the depository of Fijian interests and not the government of the day.

To accept what Minister Ganilau is proposing needs to be carefully scrutinised by all 14 Provincial Councils because if it is to take away the independent decision making of the GCC and be a rubber stamp of the government of the day, then it should be rejected outright because it would be tantamount to selling our birthright and genocide of the Fijian race.

I counsel the GCC to work together, carefully scrutinize the proposed changes carefully and test the legal capacity of Minister Ganilau first before considering its intended course of action.

Tax evasion is corruption

Tui Savu - Townsville, Auckland

Bainimarama’s efforts to evade calls for the sacking of his corrupt Interim Minister alleged to have evaded tax is so naïve making him look foolish. I have said before that if Bainimarama is fairdinkum on eradicating corruption in Fiji, then he must apply one rule for all without exception. Unfortunately, Bainimarama has failed over and over again and still doesn’t realise his actions speaks louder than his words.

He now says that he’ll not sack any Interim Minister based on allegations because it is unfair. Is he that naïve to make such a statement when you consider current FICAC investigations based on allegations against Fatiaki CJ, Frances Herman, Fijian Holdings, ACP Josaia Rasiga and many others? So what is different this time Bainimarama not to investigate your own Minister? It is about self-preservation. Bainimarama cannot sack the Minister because the Minister knows something about Bainimarama and other Interim Ministers as well, so Bainimarama needs to protect him from prosecution for their preservation.

Unfortunately, people previously held in high esteem that have compromised their reputations through their association with the coup perpetrators such as Jim Ah Koy and Filipe Bole now loudly and unashamedly advocate their preservation as well. The fact of the matter is Bainimarama is now on public record as condoning corruption himself by refusing to investigate his Minister on detailed allegations made Victor Lal and Taniela Tabu rebutting his clean up campaign.

What is of more concern is the probability that Bainimarama had no choice but to condone the corrupt practices of his Interim Minister, because he himself has now become corrupt. Now if this is so, then this coup had nothing to do with the ‘clean up campaign’, but ‘treason and perverting the course of justice’ in relation to the 5 CRW deaths, inciting mutiny, insubordination charges, etc and the political situation in Fiji will only worsen.

Everyone tainted with this coup will be held accountable one day for the part they played in this illegal regime and the great injustices inflicted upon the innocent citizens of Fiji. I recall one of Apisai Tora’s memorable comments concerning former Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka, which is so descriptive of Bainimarama when he said ‘Rabuka is consistent in his inconsistencies.’

Tui Savu,
Legal Counsel.
Townsville.

AUSTRALIA.

Wednesday, August 15, 2007

Taxman and the Minister

Corrupt Fiji Minister in Tax Evasion Racket

Last updated 8/15/2007 10:04:51 AM

A minister in the Interim Government failed to lodge tax returns for three years and was later assessed $95,000 tax on undeclared income. The minister paid late lodgement penalties when the tax returns for 2000, 2001, and 2002 were finally delivered in 2003.
The records also show a dramatic increase in bank interest over the four years, indicating cash at bank building to more than $1 million.
All this material that came into my possession before the coup indicates that this particular minister may have evaded tax.
I have had the material examined by forensic accountants who indicated that while the files are entirely typical of tax evasion they do not by themselves prove it.
They said a thorough investigation would be necessary to establish the truth.
My file on the minister's tax affairs has been handed to the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption.
My investigation covers income tax records covering a period of ten years.
In 2005, long before the current controversy that is raging over alleged tax evasion claims, I anonymously received a brown envelope whose contents clearly reveal that the Cabinet Minister had not submitted his annual tax returns for nearly three years, raising questions as to why FIRCA allowed him to do so because he was clearly in breach of the tax laws on submission of tax returns.
According to the records, the minister filed 2000, 2001 and 2002 returns together in late 2003 as all the original assessment notices were issued on 17 December 2003. The 2003 return was filed before 4 May, 2004.
FIRCA then issued amended assessments for all four years on 23 December 2004, presumably after audit and investigations. Many of the debit entries of assessments, penalties, and interest were credited (reversed) around or after those dates, as were the payments.
In January I began examining the documents on proving certain conclusions. I collaborated with overseas publications, which submitted the documents to forensic accountants who offered the view that while this kind of behaviour was entirely typical of attempted tax evasion they did not by themselves, prove tax evasion. More investigation was needed on that front.
We however found that the Cabinet minister in question did not submit returns for three years.
The tax records relating to this individual also reveal late payments, penalties, and negotiations to bring down payments, and huge lump sum payments and negotiated settlements over the ten-year period, from 1994 to 2004.
The record shows undeclared (omitted) income for each year. The audited ones show that there were penalties on the Minister for late payments. They also show that some of the penalties were, supposedly as a result of negotiation, reversed.It must be pointed out that it is not possible to identify sources of this alleged income from these documents.
That can only be identified from the actual returns submitted or as tracked by FIRCA from their own investigations, demands to banks for disclosure etc. The ten years of records show a huge increase in deposits held by the Cabinet minister, which were allegedly undeclared. This keeps increasing each year, according to the records. Assuming salary was the minister's only fixed income, the question is where did the increases in the minister�s bank deposits each year come from? FIRCA would not be interested in the source but only that one received income and he or she must pay taxes on it.
There were two payments made by the minister to FIRCA. The two entries that are most significant are the large payments made in 2004 and 2005. On 10 November, 2004, one payment of $86,069.62, under receipt number 5093831, was made to FIRCA. On 21 June 2005, another payment of $9,684.14, under receipt number 5142483, was made. The total of the two tax amounts paid by the minister and receipted is $95,753.76.
These are, according to experienced English tax assessors, very large payments by a mere politician. These are negotiated settlements for undeclared income, which the Cabinet minister could not argue out of with the Fiji taxman. The large number of assessments and charges imposed also show FIRCA "discovering" undeclared income. These two payments, at a top tax rate of 32 per cent in Fiji, represent undeclared income of around $300,000.
In observing investigative journalism guidelines, I had also sent a series of questions to the Cabinet minister concerned for answers or explanations but I am yet to receive a reply. As to Section 4 of the Income Tax Act, while the Act provides confidentiality to the taxpayer, it also requires that the taxpayer honestly declare his or her income. The law also requires that the taxpayer submit returns annually.

Verebasaga's Brother Reveals

NIMILOTE VEREBASAGA’S BROTHER WRITES

August 13th, 2007

Something Fishy

The repeated attempts by the Fiji Military to have a court martial trial on the Nimilote Verebasaga murder case has raised eyebrows on the hidden agenda of the Military particularly the Interim PM when his brother in law is involved. There has been speculations that Nimilote Verebasaga was the taxi driver that went to pick John Whippy when he was punched by Frances Kean. With the prolong investigation about my brothers death, this speculations best fit the puzzle even though DPP spokesperson Asishna Prasad confirmed to Village news on June 12th that it is common practice that if a soldier is involved in a crime against a civilian he should be dealt with through the normal court proceedings in the criminal courts. The way things are going with the Military and Police it appears that they are trying very hard to hide the truth behind Basaga’s death. It’s a dual fight for justice for my family and we will not rest until all the killers are known and charged.

NDraumasei

Nakaulevu Nakelo.

Majority Party Unfairly Sidelined

Include us, Qarase's party urges regime
Tuesday August 14, 2007

The former ruling Soqosoqo Duavata Lewenivanua says the interim regime should include them in decision making to allow for a peaceful solution in moving the country forward.

SDL national director Peceli Kinivuwai told fijilive.com that as the representative of the majority, the party should be involved in any decision making.

"You cannot get a peaceful solution if you exclude the majority," he said.

Kinivuwai said SDL is the largest political party representing 84 per cent of the indigenous population and as such should be given the recognition it deserves.

He said the party was not invited to contribute to a people's charter to be drawn up by the interim Government.

"Only ousted Prime Minister Laisenia Qarase was given the invitation as an individual," he said.

Kinivuwai adds that the party has increased its support since the December 5 military takeover.

In a statement, Kinivuwai said that people of Fiji have witnessed the gross manipulation of the machinery of government," he said.

"It has also seen the militarisation of key government positions.

"Moreover the interim Government has not found any concrete evidence to justify its cause and allegations that the SDL government was corrupt.

"The country has also seen the trampling of institutions like the GCC, NLTB, FDB, FHL all under the guise of trying to wipe out corruption.

"We have also seen the gross termination and appointment of people to various key positions."

Kinivuwai said that the SDL has a civil court case to be heard on October 2, which should spell out whether the December 5 event was legal.

"We must now put an end to all personal vendettas, malicious and baseless allegations, character assassinations and dishonest consultations," he said.

Kinivuwai stressed that the only way the country can be brought back to normalcy is for elections to be held as quickly as possible.

Meanwhile, ousted Prime Minister Laisenia Qarase is expected in Suva at the end of month to prepare for the court case.

Kinivuwai says Qarase will also be on Viti Levu to see his grandchildren whom he hasn't seen for the past 8 months after being exiled to his village in Lau in December last year.

He said the party management has been informed of this decision and is now making arrangements to welcome their party leader.

He also said that Qarase's conduct in the capital will be restricted.

"He is not allowed to meet or conduct meetings with party supporters that may be seen as a threat to national stability."

Illegal Decree to be Challenged

Decree by Fiji’s interim State challenged in court

Wednesday, August 15, 2007

Deposed Prime Minister Laisenia Qarase will challenge the military in court for overthrowing his democractically elected government on December 5 last year Taken from / By: Commonwealth.org

Any decree passed by the interim administration will be illegal and will be challenged some where down the line as the Parliament is the sole authoritative institution to grant immunity says the Fiji Law Society.

Society president Devanesh Sharma said any decree passed by the Interim government is illegal and as he understands it only Parliament can grant immunity.

“The fact of the matter is if it’s an Immunity Decree granting immunity to acts of criminality then I’m sure it will be challenged under the Constitution at a later time as well. In fact my understanding of the law and I stand to be corrected on it, an immunity can surely only be granted by the Parliament. Like in 1987, it was an act of Parliament that granted immunity to those who carried out the coup in 1987.”

Sharma said that even the fact that the decree was issued by the President of Fiji could be questioned.

“I’m not to sure how a decree passed by this interim regime can grant immunity to itself even though it may have been promulgated by the President. So the legality of this immunity decree may be under severe challenge.”

Suva lawyer Tevita Fa, who is representing deposed Prime Minister Laisenia Qarase and members of the deposed government had earlier said that he will be taking the military officials, which are the Commander to court.

Fa said his clients have been served with a summons calling for the parties to meet.


Fiji Broadcasting Corporation